Diecast Crazy Forums banner

Xfinity Series: Time to embrace the Owner's Championship

1159 Views 22 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  OutdoorDinsmore


by Jason Higgins

NASCAR’s Xfinity Series seems to be in a perpetual identity crisis. Sprint Cup drivers dominate Victory Lane, and drivers who rarely compete for wins are competing for championships. What if there is a way to make the Xfinity Series stand out as unique? And what if it is something NASCAR already does, but nobody really discusses?


I enjoy the Xfinity Series. I do not have a problem with Cup drivers dropping down and “stealing” the wins from Xfinity regulars. I do not have a problem with Cup teams developing crew chief, pit crew, and car builder-talent by having their best drivers (Cup drivers, naturally) drive their Xfinity cars and compete for wins. I do not believe the Xfinity Series – as a racing series – needs to be “fixed.”

NASCAR tried to “fix” the Xfinity Series in 2011. After five straight years of Cup drivers winning the JV series championship, NASCAR ruled that each driver must compete for only one series championship., leading to seasons like 2013, where Cup drivers won 29 of 33 then-Nationwide races anyway, and Austin Dillon “earned” the Nationwide Series championship without winning a race.

(Am I the only one who thinks a driver going to Homestead for the season finale with both championships on the line would have been awesome? I believe Kyle Busch once said he thought winning both championships in the same season was the greatest thing a NASCAR driver could accomplish…and that’s a bad idea? Sometimes I think NASCAR is just determined not to let their fans have nice things.)

Since the start of the 2011 season, championship-eligible drivers have won 38 Xfinity races, out of 168 starts! Has NASCAR’s “one championship” policy curbed Cup drivers from poaching nearly 80% of the Xfinity Series wins? Obviously not. And I have yet to see an article about Xfinity Series television ratings or attendance improving directly as a result of the decision to exclude the drivers that win the most races from the series championship.

In 2016, NASCAR has instituted the Chase in the Xfinity Series: 26 pre-Chase races leading to a seven-race Chase among 12 championship-eligible drivers. Drivers, who – probably – will have accounted for as many wins combined as you can count on one hand.

Is that satisfying to anyone? Has it been for the last few seasons?

However, there has been a championship in the Xfinity Series that would have some built-in drama. One that would reward the “best of the best”, and would perhaps, with this new Chase format, even result in an underdog, Xfinity-only team winning the championship. And NASCAR doesn’t even have to do anything to make it happen. They just have to get people talking about it.

I am referring to the Xfinity Series owner’s championship.

If you have followed the Xfinity Series, you know that when they get near the end of the season, a commentator (Marty Reid, usually) would talk about “the all-important owner’s title”. Did you know the owner’s champion gets the same amount of prize money at the NASCAR banquet as the drivers’ champion? It is a 50/50 split between drivers and owners, with a 99/1 split for people’s attention.

Did you know that despite Kyle Busch dominating the Xfinity Series since, like, 1976, his team hasn’t actually won the owner’s championship since 2012? That is because Team Penske’s #22 has beaten Joe Gibbs Racing’s #54 for the Xfinity owner’s championship three years in a row. Doesn’t that seem like an interesting storyline that people should be talking about? This is a thing that has actually happened!

And do not accuse Penske and JGR of entirely stacking the deck with their driver talent. Yes, Brad Keselowski and Joey Logano make most of the starts in Penske’s #22, but Ryan Blaney won in that car last year and Alex Tagliani nearly did as well. Meanwhile, Kyle Busch won several race in the JGR #54 (now #18), but last year Erik Jones did, too, and Boris Said (!) ran five (!!) races in that car. Why wasn’t that part of the story “the pressure is on Boris Said to not lose too many points to the 22”? All you have to do is promote it, NASCAR.


As of today, it is hard to imagine getting all that fired up about the 2016 Xfinity Series Chase for the Championship. If you look at the 2015 season*, you would see that starting the Chase would have been three drivers with a combined four wins (Chase Elliott, Chris Buescher, and Ryan Reed) and you could have easily picked the drivers out making up most of the Chase as the championship-eligible drivers from the Cup-affiliated Xfinity teams. The only “who makes the Chase” drama would have been for the final two spots, where Jeremy Clements and Ross Chastain were 11th and 12th in points after Chicago, with J.J. Yeley only two points out of the final spot.

(*Yes, I know things might have played out differently if the Chase had been a thing last year. But seriously, Clements, Chastain, and Yeley? That’s where the “drama” is?)

However, if you look at the 2015 owner’s race with the Chase applied? Wow. Headed to Chicago, NINE teams had wins (Joey Logano has won at Watkins Glen in the part-time Penske #12 and that car would not have been eligible for the Chase). Erik Jones had won in TWO Gibbs cars. THREE drivers had won in the Penske #22. Two drivers had won in the #33 for Richard Childress Racing, and both the #54 and #20 for JGR. All three JR Motorsports cars (the #7, #9, and #88) had won. And although he had not won a race, Ty Dillon had driven the RCR #3 to fifth in owner’s points and would have been locked in to the owner’s Chase.

Meanwhile, the last two owner’s Chase spots would have been settled among four Xfinity Series “regulars”. Elliott Sadler, Brian Scott, Darrell Wallace Jr., and Daniel Suarez were separated by twelve points headed to Chicago. Any of the four would have clinched a spot in the theoretical 2015 owner’s Chase with a win. Would that not have been awesome? And as it turned out, Bubba Wallace finished third at Chicago and would have knocked Brian Scott out of the final Chase spot.

After the first round of the Chase, there would have been eight teams remaining. The #22 (Ryan Blaney, again), #7, and #33 would have advanced on wins, while the #20 would have advanced on points, along with four Xfinity-regular teams: the #60, #9, #1, and #6 teams all would have advanced to the second round. Who would not have advanced? The #54, and not because of Erik Jones, who finished 8th at Kentucky in his would-be Chase start). The #54 would have been left out due to a crash at Charlotte, where the car finished 31st. With Kyle Busch behind the wheel.

Admit it, you just fell in love with this, you Kyle Busch-haters.

The final four would have been the #22, the #20 (thanks to two Erik Jones top-4 finishes), the #33, and the #7. Four different teams, all race winners, all with either a mixture of Cup and non-Cup drivers or an Xfinity regular behind the wheel. Nobody would like this? It would be different, and fun, and would embrace the differences between the Xfinity Series and the Cup Series. It might even give the Xfinity Series – shhhhhh! – an indentity.

I really believe if NASCAR started to push the Xfinity owner’s championship fans would get behind it. NASCAR would not have to limit the field in the season finale, where they currently have ruled out any Cup Chase drivers from competing (by the way, Kyle Larson won this race last year, and he would have been eligible even with the “no Cup Chasers” rule.) Instead of trying to avoid the embarrassment of the “championship drivers” running for sixth, behind five Cup drivers, they could have the top teams with the best drivers running for the owner’s title, and the teams with Xfinity-eligible drivers (by choice) still running for the driver’s championship.

Xfinity Series: Time to embrace the Owner’s Championship
See less See more
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
So instead of promoting the drivers this guy wants to promote the cup backed teams as they stroke their egos in the lower series? That sounds like a blast. I can't wait to see if Gibbs, Roush, Hendrick (JRM), RCR, Penske, etc...can win the title...oh wait i can watch that in cup. So what does Xfinity offer then? I must be missing something.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Disagree completely. For years the broadcast team at ESPN tried to push the irrelevant owners championship on fans and it fell flat. I remember when Owen Kelly was driving the #54 at Mid-Ohio he spun out and Rusty Wallace was like "oh no! that's really going to hurt gibbs shot at the owners title!" and it was just hilarious. The owners points rankings determine how much a team is paid in the following season. So, the owners championship is very important-to the owners. That's it. No one else, especially the fans, cares. Fans care about how good the racing is and how their favorite drivers are doing. No amount of pushing the owners title will make fans, especially casual fans, care about whether super rich Roger Penske's #22 team driver by cup drivers will earn slightly more purse money next year than super rich Joe Gibb's #18 team driven by mostly cup drivers. The broadcast team in the Nationwide/Xfinity series has constanly talked about the owners championship for years now (I remember around 2010 they really started pushing it.) and after 7 years it's yet to be interesting, especially with the same 2 cars (#22 and #54/#18) being the top two every year. If Nascar really wants to, as you say, "avoid the embarrassment of the “championship drivers” running for sixth, behind five Cup drivers"

A. Have less companion races. If they want a 33 race schedule (personally I think cutting it back to 26 or 28 would help owners save money) have less than 17 or 18 of them be companion races

B. Limit cup drivers to 5 starts a year

C. Declare that cup drivers (who are ineligible for driver points) are also ineligible for owners points as well. Tell the owners if you want the owners championship, you're going to have to earn it by giving non-cup drivers a shot.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Is this an article from 4 years ago? The solution to fixing this shithole series is not promoting the Cup drivers and Cup teams... it's distancing, if only slightly, from Cup owners and drivers.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
NASCAR is the only top ranked Motor Racing Series that still allows their main game drivers to drop down and race against the up and comers. You don't see this in F1, V8Supercars, Indy, IMSA, Le Mans etc....This is just one of many reasons I no longer care about watching NASCAR.....
The more I think about it, the more I think this series is screwed.

I've said for years the best solution for limiting Cup drivers in the Xfinity Series is to have separate schedules. You make very inconvenient for drivers to run both series. However, with so few Xfinity-only and Truck-only tracks, I don't see it happening. You have great tracks like Memphis, Gateway, Pikes Peak, Milwaukee, etc. that fell out of the series because it wasn't profitable. It made more sense to basically close those tracks even though they were perfectly usable tracks for Xfinity. Now they'd need updating, of course. Hell, the East Series would probably be too expensive for these tracks if they were all still operating.

I loved this series as a kid. It was different from Cup. Yeah, you had some Cup drivers and a few Cup teams here and there, but you had your mainstays -- LaJoie, McLaughlin, Purvis, Sawyer, Keller -- and you had the unique tracks. You also had your guys graduate to Cup. It was so much fun. Trucks were the same way.

But with many things in NASCAR, the big wigs got too greedy. Instead of having a series that could stand on its own, now we have this. It's now a series that can't be promoted on its own. They made both Xfinity and Trucks to be bigger than they could be. Honestly, it's probably too late to go back.

I wasn't completely serious yesterday when I said the Xfinity Series should be scrapped and a new series put in its place. The more I think about it... that's exactly what needs to happen.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 5
NASCAR is the only top ranked Motor Racing Series that allows their main game drivers to drop down and race against the up and comers. You don't see this in F1, V8Supercars, Indy, IMSA, Le Mans etc....This is just one of many reasons I no longer care about watching NASCAR.....
'Anymore' is the key word missing there. F1 drivers used to drop down all the time, but too many got injured or killed and teams stopped allowing it. With Kyle Busch's injury (and many before that), it is interesting that more teams don't say 'no' to Cup drivers racing elsewhere. I guess considering these guys basically race for the same team in other series, they also see the dollar signs and let it go. It'll take a death of a Cup guy in the Xfinity Series to change it, I think.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
NASCAR is the only top ranked Motor Racing Series that allows their main game drivers to drop down and race against the up and comers. You don't see this in F1, V8Supercars, Indy, IMSA, Le Mans etc....This is just one of many reasons I no longer care about watching NASCAR.....
At times, I think there is some benefit to up and coming drivers to get to race against cup stars. However, the extent to which they "double dip" has long been out of hand. Former Xfinity driver Charles Lewandoski said on Twitter yesterday "I never learned a thing from someone who showed up and led every lap". Now, young drivers (especially ones without a sponsor or a cup ride owned by their grandpa waiting for them) have to take crappy cup rides because all the Xfinity seats are taken by cup drivers, and then end up underperforming because they moved up too quick. Ryan Truex, Jeb Burton, Alex Bowman, Matt DiBenedetto, etc. should be the guys in the best Xfinity rides.

Imagine a high school quarterback being told that he can't play college because guys like Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson, etc. were are playing college quarterback on Saturdays in addition to their regular job, so the only job the high school kid can get is backup on an NFL team. That's not how it should work and the current business model of the Xfinity series is hurting the growth of the sport and destroying the chance for new talent to emerge.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Anyone know how long you can beat a dead horse until it just turns to dust? I think we're getting close, lol.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Anyone know how long you can beat a dead horse until it just turns to dust? I think we're getting close, lol.
Do you honestly enjoy watching Xfinity races every week? There have a few good races here and there (Mid-Ohio last year was lots of fun), but it's few and far between. I've tuned out. I haven't watched a lap this year, and I know I'm not alone. I also know NASCAR can have a Triple-A series, have it be fun to watch and have it be a success. They've done it before. I won't accept what they give us now.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I agree that NASCAR doesn't like its fans to have nice things. I disagree that banning Cup guys from getting Xfinity points is an example of NASCAR not wanting its fans to have nice things.
I have not watched a single lap live of NXS this season since the opening laps of Daytona. Races like yesterday provide me with zero motivation to watch
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Do you honestly enjoy watching Xfinity races every week? There have a few good races here and there (Mid-Ohio last year was lots of fun), but it's few and far between. I've tuned out. I haven't watched a lap this year, and I know I'm not alone. I also know NASCAR can have a Triple-A series, have it be fun to watch and have it be a success. They've done it before. I won't accept what they give us now.
It's not about my enjoyment. It's about the fact that these articles about "fixing" the series are tiresome because people rarely discuss anything other that limit these guys, ban these guys, don't let cup teams run for this championship, etc. The problem is some people use the "quality of racing" to better an argument about limiting Sprint Cup drivers. What happens when NASCAR limits them and people realize that was only a percentage of the problem? Cup drivers alone is not "killing" the series. Cup drivers alone is not creating poor racing. There's bigger issues that need to be addressed for the "quality of racing" then telling the cup driver they're not allowed to play in the sandbox anymore. That's if people are actually interested in improving the racing vs. using that as an excuse.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It's not about my enjoyment. It's about the fact that these articles about "fixing" the series are tiresome because people rarely discuss anything other that limit these guys, ban these guys, don't let cup teams run for this championship, etc. The problem is some people use the "quality of racing" to better an argument about limiting Sprint Cup drivers. What happens when NASCAR limits them and people realize that was only a percentage of the problem? Cup drivers alone is not "killing" the series. Cup drivers alone is not creating poor racing. There's bigger issues that need to be addressed for the "quality of racing" then telling the cup driver they're not allowed to play in the sandbox anymore. That's if people are actually interested in improving the racing vs. using that as an excuse.
I agree that cup drivers are not the only problem the series is facing, but that's probably 50-60% of it. I don't think that banning or limiting cup drivers would fix the series or the racing overnight (even without cup drivers yesterdays race would have been god-awful and unwatchable) but it's a start. Banning cup drivers won't fix the series, but doing nothing and pretending everything is ok won't fix the series either. The status quo of the series CANNOT be continued as is.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
It's not about my enjoyment. It's about the fact that these articles about "fixing" the series are tiresome because people rarely discuss anything other that limit these guys, ban these guys, don't let cup teams run for this championship, etc. The problem is some people use the "quality of racing" to better an argument about limiting Sprint Cup drivers. What happens when NASCAR limits them and people realize that was only a percentage of the problem? Cup drivers alone is not "killing" the series. Cup drivers alone is not creating poor racing. There's bigger issues that need to be addressed for the "quality of racing" then telling the cup driver they're not allowed to play in the sandbox anymore. That's if people are actually interested in improving the racing vs. using that as an excuse.
I agree with that. Cup drivers and Cup teams are an obvious problem, but far from the only problem. I'm tired of all the big-ass tracks the series goes to. I want short tracks. They create excitement. Places like Atlanta, Vegas, Texas, yawn, yawn, yawn. Stock car racing got its start on tracks 1 mile and shorter. Time for a comeback?
  • Like
Reactions: 3
It's not about my enjoyment. It's about the fact that these articles about "fixing" the series are tiresome because people rarely discuss anything other that limit these guys, ban these guys, don't let cup teams run for this championship, etc. The problem is some people use the "quality of racing" to better an argument about limiting Sprint Cup drivers. What happens when NASCAR limits them and people realize that was only a percentage of the problem? Cup drivers alone is not "killing" the series. Cup drivers alone is not creating poor racing. There's bigger issues that need to be addressed for the "quality of racing" then telling the cup driver they're not allowed to play in the sandbox anymore. That's if people are actually interested in improving the racing vs. using that as an excuse.
Cup Champions in Cup championship equipement vs Brennan Poole, Jeb Burton, etc: Great recipe for enjoyable racing. /s

No matter what rules package you use, those guys are going to stomp on the "rookies" until you either ban them or prevent them from running in elite Cup equipment
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Nope. We don't need to give Kyle, Brad, Joey, etc any more praise for ruining the series.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Been saying that for awhile. It will take the death of a well known Cup driver in this series or a Truck race to get the rule to change. No one mentions how Ernie Irvan's career ended in 1999 while practicing for a Busch race. Or how Bobby Labonte broke his shoulder in a Darlington race or practice in the Spring of 1999 and ruined his championship chances that year.


'Anymore' is the key word missing there. F1 drivers used to drop down all the time, but too many got injured or killed and teams stopped allowing it. With Kyle Busch's injury (and many before that), it is interesting that more teams don't say 'no' to Cup drivers racing elsewhere. I guess considering these guys basically race for the same team in other series, they also see the dollar signs and let it go. It'll take a death of a Cup guy in the Xfinity Series to change it, I think.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I enjoyed watching the Xfinity race in person this year at Atlanta but if you watched it on tv you would have been bored.

On a side topic I was bummed they didn't offer a raced wind Diecast of his car for selfish reasons.
Cup Champions in Cup championship equipement vs Brennan Poole, Jeb Burton, etc: Great recipe for enjoyable racing. /s

No matter what rules package you use, those guys are going to stomp on the "rookies" until you either ban them or prevent them from running in elite Cup equipment
So.. are we looking for better racing or to stop the "stomping" of rookies? Because, really, that's two totally different things.
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top